|
What is SIL?
SIL is clearly international, perhaps better said "supranational" in the words of one of our founders A. Thienemann. Our membership extends to some 80 countries and is expanding rapidly in tropical regions that had been underrepresented previously. SIL is limnological. We have aggressively expanded the interests and activities of SIL to all inland waters. For example, research, interactions, and instructional activities on tropical and saline waters, constituting over half of surface waters, have been enhanced markedly in SIL during the past decade. In addition to these broad topics, vigorous attention is being given to detailed and rigorous research on specific subjects of major functional importance, e.g., microbiology, land-water interface, and many others, particularly associated with working groups. SIL is really SILTA, theoretical and applied. A very significant, and increasing, portion of our membership is integrating fundamental research-driven understanding into practical questions of human usage of freshwater resources. Much greater emphasis is being given to the integration of exponentially expanding human activities into the composite analyses of freshwater ecosystems and their effective management than was the case previously. We have been attacking these enormous problems from many directions, particularly by encouraging interdisciplinary coupled research developments on complex ecosystems of great biological and economic importance, e.g., Lake Tanganyika. SIL is scientific. This statement is foremost and fundamental, and clearly must remain the foundation of SILTA. If the scientific foundation of SIL is weakened or compromised in any manner, the demise of the association is certain. Why am I so adamant about this point? A small but vocal contingency of our membership insists that the primary function of SIL should be to address social problems of environmental utilization by devoting most of the SIL expertise and financial resources to environmental education and activism. Publications of SIL are treated incorrectly by these ill-informed individuals with contemptuous disdain as worthless. An overwhelming majority of SIL members appreciate the need for activism in addressing social ills in relation to fresh water but are steadfast that SIL can only be effective if it has scientific credibility as its essential underpinning. As has been demonstrated so often in many international groups, the essential scientific expertise will not participate if the dominating science foundation of the congresses and working groups is supplanted with endless gaseous rhetoric and debate about social environmental ills. SIL will be rendered impotent without a scientific journal. The only important communication in science is the written, published record in scientific journals. Oral presentations are heard by only a minuscule audience and the words quickly dissipate. Abstracts are not true published records. Research that is not published and communicated to the scientific community in written form is not completed. The interactive scientific expertise that has been nurtured and networked over seven decades in SIL activities and congresses will simply dissipate and not participate without the scientific structure. Every member of SIL must retain his or her constitutional right to present and publish a scientific contribution in a quality scientific journal. This statute is not only accepted but demanded by an overwhelming majority of SIL members. SIL has a primary responsibility to provide quality scientific proceedings. In 1988, SIL established a Publications Committee to evaluate the opinions of the membership towards our publications, their quality, and costs. I summarize the results of that report here (available upon request from the General Secretary).
SIL is vigorous, diverse, and growing in its roles in the scientific and public communities. It also has limitations. For example, it is becoming so large and active in many multidisciplinary directions that several full-time paid business and international lobbying officers should be undertaking the daily operations. The costs of such a business office would however approach our current total annual income and it is obviously not possible. The present reliance upon donated time by persons in addition to their regular full-time employment limits what can be done. However, complacency is not acceptable and much more can be done by means of further collaboration and cooperation by the membership. I express my appreciation to so many that have helped, particularly National Representatives of the International Committee and other committee members. We have gained, but we can do much more to increase our profession to the supranational level. As Bede noted, "It is better never to begin a good work than, having begun it, to stop." SIL must always be flexible with the needs of the profession, but the science foundation is the sustaining good work and must never be compromised. |